Everyone flatters your idea. We put it on trial.
Dozens of different AI models examine your idea from every angle: they research real evidence and competitors on the web, prosecute, defend and vote. And you watch it, live.
Write your idea and take it to trial
Why it exists
Nobody tells you the truth about your idea.
Friends are too polite. Co-founders are optimistic. ChatGPT was built to encourage. You're left with an idea in your head and no honest feedback. That's what the Court is for: a prosecutor tries to convict it, a defender stands for it, and a jury of different AI models disagrees right in front of you. Authority — without the flattery.
The proceedings
A full trial, from charge to verdict.
Each step lights up in front of you, live. Then it's saved to replay.
The scale
Over 40 AI requests per trial.
Every seat is a different model, drawn from a bench of over 30 models across 16 AI companies.
The 16 AI companies in the cast
AI vs. AI
Not one AI's opinion. It's AI versus AI.
One model accuses. Another reads what it wrote and rebuts it point by point. Then twelve jurors judge the clash — and re-review each other blind, not knowing whose score is whose. That's what turns the score into the result of a contest, not the mood of a chatbot.
The verdict
Calculated by a formula. Not decided by an LLM.
Nine criteria, all weighted equally. The average of the jurors' scores becomes a percentage, and the percentage falls into a fixed band. No model picks the verdict: it comes from a calculation you can audit. An idea that's still just an idea isn't punished for traction or execution only a running business would have.
The nine criteria, equal weight
The method
Not a gimmick. A method.
Frontier research on AI evaluation says two things: replace the single judge with a jury of diverse models, and don't let the AI set the final score. The Tribunal was built this way from day one.
Based on multi-model jury research (LLM-as-a-Jury) for AI evaluation.
Real evidence
Anchored in real pain, not guesswork.
Before the debate, we search the web for pain from people who have the problem and competitors that already exist — with a source link. Every argument is marked: real source or AI reasoning. And if the search finds nothing concrete, we tell you — instead of making it up.
What you take home
The show ends. The value stays.
Reliability
If a juror falls, another steps in.
Dozens of models, with fault tolerance in every seat. If a juror doesn't respond, another model takes over its seat in its place. And if failures compromise the trial, your credit comes back. Live, in a few minutes, and you can replay it whenever you want.
Pricing
Start at R$ 19.
1 credit = 1 trial, one appeal included. Credits never expire.
Tweaked the idea after the verdict? Your first revision is included in the credit: refine the text or appeal. The next ones cost 1 credit, each judged against the previous version.
FAQ
Frequently asked questions
Does this evaluate AI models, like "LLM as a judge"?
We use the same technique, a jury of many models, but aimed at your business idea, not at another AI's output.
Is the score decided by an AI?
No. The models assess criterion by criterion; the final verdict is a formula you can audit.
Is it infallible?
We don't promise perfection. The method reduces bias and is transparent: we mark what's real evidence and what's AI reasoning.
Is my idea public?
No. Private by default; you decide whether to turn on the link to share.
Put your idea in the dock.
Write it in one sentence. The court handles the rest — live.